When AI Crawlers Behave Like a DDoS: How Content Owners Can Protect Their Websites
- Tiffany Quach
- Jan 15, 2025
- 3 min read
Updated: 6 days ago
In January 2025, TechCrunch reported on an incident in which automated crawling activity associated with an AI model overwhelmed a small company’s website, effectively rendering it unusable for extended periods. While the activity was not a traditional distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack, the volume, frequency, and persistence of requests had a similar operational impact.
The incident highlights a growing issue for content owners and licensors: AI scraping at scale can create real technical and legal risk, even when the intent is data collection rather than disruption.
AI Crawlers and DDoS-Like Behavior
Modern AI crawlers are designed to collect large volumes of data efficiently. When improperly throttled or insufficiently constrained, that activity can resemble malicious traffic patterns:
sustained high request rates
repeated access to content-heavy pages
strain on infrastructure not designed for constant automated access
For small or mid-sized websites, especially those hosting proprietary or licensed content, this can lead to downtime, degraded performance, or service outages.
Why Robots.txt Alone Is Not Sufficient
Many site operators assume that configuring a robots.txt file is enough to control scraping. While robots.txt directives are an important first step, they rely on voluntary compliance.
Some AI providers publicly state that their crawlers honor robots.txt instructions. Others may not, or may operate through multiple user agents or infrastructure layers that complicate enforcement.
As a result, content owners should treat robots.txt as one layer in a broader defense strategy, not a complete solution.
Practical Steps to Limit AI Scraping Risk
Based on common patterns seen across recent incidents, content owners should consider the following safeguards.
1. Explicitly Block Known AI Crawlers in Robots.txt
Website operators can configure robots.txt to deny access to known AI crawler user agents, including:
• GPTBot
• ChatGPT-User
• OAI-SearchBot
• crawlers associated with other AI services
Providers such as OpenAI, Anthropic, and Perplexity publish documentation describing their crawler behavior and user agents. Those references should be reviewed regularly, as crawler names and practices can change.
2. Deploy Firewall and Traffic-Filtering Services
Infrastructure tools such as Cloudflare or similar web application firewalls can help:
identify known scraping IP ranges
detect abnormal request patterns
block traffic from data centers commonly used for large-scale scraping
This layer is particularly important when crawler behavior exceeds what robots.txt was designed to manage.
3. Enforce Request Rate Limits
Rate limiting helps prevent excessive automated access by restricting how frequently a single client or IP can request resources.v Without rate limits, even “legitimate” crawlers can unintentionally overwhelm systems designed for human traffic patterns.
4. Use CAPTCHAs and Bot Detection on High-Value Pages
CAPTCHAs and bot-detection mechanisms can help distinguish human users from automated requests, particularly for:
content-heavy pages
licensed or proprietary materials
endpoints frequently targeted by scrapers
While not appropriate for every page, selective deployment can materially reduce risk.
The Broader Issue: AI Training vs. Content Ownership
The TechCrunch report underscores a broader tension emerging across the technology ecosystem. AI developers require large data sets. Content owners rely on controlled access, licensing, and infrastructure stability.
As AI scraping becomes more aggressive and automated, technical controls, contractual protections, and operational safeguards are increasingly intertwined. Companies that host valuable content can no longer assume that “passive” publication is risk-free.
Key Takeaway for Content Owners
AI scraping is not inherently malicious, but at scale, it can create real operational harm.
Companies that host proprietary, licensed, or high-value content should proactively evaluate:
how AI crawlers interact with their websites
whether existing controls are sufficient
how scraping activity could affect uptime, performance, and contractual obligations
Waiting until an incident occurs often means discovering vulnerabilities only after damage is done.
The information provided is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this article does not establish an attorney-client relationship.


Comments